Anovular conditions impacting fertility in dairy cattle and considerations for clinical management

  • Jennifer Roberts Boehringer Ingelheim Animal Health, Duluth, GA, USA
  • Clare Scully Department of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, School of Veterinary Medicine, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA, USA
Keywords: Anovulation, anestrus, dairy cattle, infertility

Abstract

Reproductive performance is a primary driver of herd profitability and reproductive failure or infertility is one of the main causes of culling in USA dairy herds. Nearly ⅓ of dairy cows in USA experience anovulation in early lactation leading to increases in days open and reductions in first service conception rates. Anestrus and anovulation in dairy cows can be attributed to many causes including parity, postpartum uterine or systemic diseases, nutritional deficiencies, body condition loss, and stress. Identification and management of anovular cows, including strategies to reduce the incidence of anovulation, are critical to the overall reproductive performance of the herd. The aim of this review is to highlight causes, recent research on anovulatory conditions, and clinical approaches to management to improve dairy herd reproductive outcomes.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References


1.
Wiltbank MC, Gümen A, Sartori R: Physiological classification of anovulatory conditions in cattle. Theriogenology 2002;57:21-52. doi: 10.1016/S0093-691X(01)00656-2

2.
Peter AT, Vos PLAM, Ambrose DJ: Postpartum anestrus in dairy cattle. Theriogenology 2009;71:1333-1342. doi: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2008.11.012

3.
Pinedo P, Santos JEP, Galvão KN, et al: Combined effect of purulent vaginal discharge and anovulation on pregnancy status in a large multi-state population of Holstein cows. JDS Commun 2023;4:106-110. doi: 10.3168/jdsc.2022-0271

4.
Butler WR: Nutritional interactions with reproductive performance in dairy cattle. Anim Reprod Sci 2000;60-61:449-457. doi: 10.1016/S0378-4320(00)00076-2

5.
Banuelos S, Stevenson JS: Transition cow metabolites and physical traits influence days to first postpartum ovulation in dairy cows. Theriogenology 2021;173:133-143. doi: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2021.08.002

6.
Dubuc J, Duffield TF, Leslie KE, et al: Risk factors and effects of postpartum anovulation in dairy cows. J Dairy Sci 2012;95:1845-1854. doi: 10.3168/jds.2011-4781

7.
Monteiro PLJ, Gonzales B, Drum JN, et al: Prevalence and risk factors related to anovular phenotypes in dairy cows. J Dairy Sci 2021;104:2369-2383. doi: 10.3168/jds.2020-18828

8.
Sterry RA, Silva E, Kolb D, et al: Strategic treatment of anovular dairy cows with GnRH. Theriogenology 2009;71:534-542. doi: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2008.08.020

9.
Bisinotto RS, Greco LF, Ribeiro ES, et al: Influences of nutrition and metabolism on fertility of dairy cows. Anim Reprod 2012;9:260-272.

10.
Herlihy MM, Giordano JO, Souza AH, et al: Presynchronization with Double-Ovsynch improves fertility at first postpartum artificial insemination in lactating dairy cows. J Dairy Sci 2012;95:7003-7014. doi: 10.3168/jds.2011-5260

11.
Ayres H, Ferreira RM, Cunha AP, et al: Double-Ovsynch in high-producing dairy cows: effects on progesterone concentrations and ovulation to GnRH treatments. Theriogenology 2013;79:159-164. doi: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2012.10.001

12.
Santos VG, Carvalho PD, Maia C, et al: Fertility of lactating Holstein cows submitted to a Double-Ovsynch protocol and timed artificial insemination versus artificial insemination after synchronization of estrus at a similar day in milk range. J Dairy Sci 2017;100:8507-8517. doi: 10.3168/jds.2017-13210

13.
Gümen A, Wiltbank MC: Length of progesterone exposure needed to resolve large follicle anovular condition in dairy cows. Theriogenology 2005;63:202-218. doi: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2004.04.009

14.
Borchardt S, Haimerl P, Pohl A, et al: Evaluation of prostaglandin F2α versus prostaglandin F2α plus gonadotropin-releasing hormone as Presynch methods preceding an Ovsynch in lactating dairy cows: A meta-analysis. J Dairy Sci 2017;100:4065-4077. doi: 10.3168/jds.2016-11956

15.
Sandals WC, Curtis RA, Cote JF, et al: The effect of retained placenta and metritis complex on reproductive performance in dairy cattle – a case control study. Can Vet J 1979;20:131-135.

16.
de Boer M, Buddle BM, Heuer C, et al: Associations between intrauterine bacterial infection, reproductive tract inflammation, and reproductive performance in pasture-based dairy cows. Theriogenology 2015;83:1514-1524. doi: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2015.01.032

17.
Moraes JGN, Silva PRB, Mendonça LGD, et al: Risk factors for purulent vaginal discharge and its association with reproductive performance of lactating Jersey cows. J Dairy Sci 2021;104:12816-12829. doi: 10.3168/jds.2021-20502

18.
Giuliodori MJ, Magnasco RP, Becu-Villalobos D, et al: Metritis in dairy cows: risk factors and reproductive performance. J Dairy Sci 2013;96:3621-3631. doi: 10.3168/jds.2012-5922

19.
LeBlanc SJ. Review: Postpartum reproductive disease and fertility in dairy cows. Animal 2023;17:e100781. doi: 10.1016/j.animal.2023.100781

20.
Gilbert RO: Symposium review: mechanisms of disruption of fertility by infectious diseases of the reproductive tract. J Dairy Sci Vol 2029;102:3754-3765. doi: 10.3168/jds.2018-15602

21.
Cheong SH, Filho OGS, Absalon-Medina VA, et al: Uterine and systemic inflammation influences ovarian follicular function in postpartum dairy cows. PLoS One 2017;12:e0177356. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0177356

22.
Nelli RK, De Koster J, Roberts JN, et al: Impact of uterine macrophage phenotype on placental retention in dairy cows. Theriogenology 2019;127:145-152. doi: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2019.01.011

23.
Vieira-Neto A, Gilbert RO, Butler WR, et al: Individual and combined effects of anovulation and cytological endometritis on the reproductive performance of dairy cows. J Dairy Sci 2014;97:5415-5425. doi: 10.3168/jds.2013-7725

24.
Middleton EL, Minela T, Pursley JR: The high-fertility cycle: how timely pregnancies in one lactation may lead to less body condition loss, fewer health issues, greater fertility, and reduced early pregnancy losses in the next lactation. J Dairy Sci 2019;102:5577-5587. doi: 10.3168/jds.2018-15828

25.
Torabi A, Stock A, Vallejo D, et al: Large ovary syndrome in cattle: a retrospective study. Clin Theriogenol 2021;13:352-359.

26.
El-Sheikh Ali H, Kitahara G, Nibe K, et al: Plasma anti-Müllerian hormone as a biomarker for bovine granulosa-theca cell tumors: comparison with immunoreactive inhibin and ovarian steroid concentrations. Theriogenology 2013;80:940-949. doi: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2013.07.022

27.
Roberts JN, Carleton LC, Conley AJ, et al: Theriogenology question of the month. J Am Vet Med Assoc 2015;247:153-155. doi: 10.2460/javma.247.2.153

28.
Silvia WJ, Hatler TB, Nugent AM, et al: Ovarian follicular cysts in dairy cows: an abnormality in folliculogenesis. Domest Anim Endocrinol 2002;23:167-177. doi: 10.1016/S0739-7240(02)00154-6

29.
Hatler TB, Hayes SH, Laranja da Fonseca LF, et al: Relationship between endogenous progesterone and follicular dynamics in lactating dairy cows with ovarian follicular cysts. Biol Reprod 2003;69:218-223. doi: 10.1095/biolreprod.102.012179

30.
Biran D, Braw-Tal R, Gendelman M, et al: ACTH administration during formation of preovulatory follicles impairs steroidogenesis and angiogenesis in association with ovulation failure in lactating cows. Domest Anim Endocrinol 2015;53:52-59. doi: 10.1016/j.domaniend.2015.05.002

31.
Peter AT: An update on cystic ovarian degeneration in cattle. Reprod Domest Anim 2004;39:1-7. doi: 10.1046/j.0936-6768.2003.00466.x

32.
Hooijer GA, Lubbers RBF, Ducro BJ, et al: Genetic parameters for cystic ovarian disease in Dutch Black and White dairy cattle. J Dairy Sci 2001;84:286-291. doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(01)74478-5

33.
Koeck A, Loker S, Miglior F, et al: Genetic relationships of clinical mastitis, cystic ovaries, and lameness with milk yield and somatic cell score in first-lactation Canadian Holsteins. J Dairy Sci 2014;97:5806-5813. doi: 10.3168/jds.2013-7785

34.
Millward S, Mueller K, Smith R, et al: A post-mortem survey of bovine female reproductive tracts in the UK. Front Vet Sci 2019;6:e451. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2019.00451

35.
Crane MB, Bartolome J, Melendez P, et al: Comparison of synchronization of ovulation with timed insemination and exogenous progesterone as therapeutic strategies for ovarian cysts in lactating dairy cows. Theriogenology 2006;65:1563-1574. doi: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2005.09.003

36.
Sakaguchi M, Sasamoto Y, Suzuki T, et al: Fate of cystic ovarian follicles and the subsequent fertility of early postpartum dairy cows. Vet Rec 2006;159:197-201. doi: 10.1136/vr.159.7.197

37.
Jeengar K, Chaudhary V, Kumar A, et al: Ovarian cysts in dairy cows: old and new concepts for definition, diagnosis, and therapy. Anim Reprod 2014;11:63-73.

38.
Borş SI, Borş A: Ovarian cysts, an anovulatory condition in dairy cattle. J Vet Med Sci 2020;82:1515-1522. doi: 10.1292/jvms.20-0381

39.
Turner ZB, Lima FS, Conley AJ, et al: Cystic ovarian disease in dairy cattle: diagnostic accuracy when using B-mode and color Doppler ultrasound. J Dairy Sci 2023;106:3411-3420. doi: 10.3168/jds.2022-22498

40.
Hooijer GA, Frankena K, Schuring M, et al: Treatment of cystic ovarian disease in dairy cows with gonadotrophin-releasing hormone: a field study. Vet Q 1999;21:33-37. doi: 10.1080/01652176.1999.9694988

41.
De Rensis F, Bottarelli E, Battioni F, et al: Reproductive performance of dairy cows with ovarian cysts after synchronizing ovulation using GnRH or hCG during the warm or cool period of the year. Theriogenology 2008;69:481-484. doi: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2007.10.018

42.
Todoroki J, Kaneko H: Formation of follicular cysts in cattle and therapeutic effects of controlled internal drug release. J Reprod Dev 2006;52:1-11. doi: 10.1262/jrd.17081

43.
De Vries A, Crane MB, Bartolome JA, et al: Economic comparison of timed artificial insemination and exogenous progesterone as treatments for ovarian cysts. J Dairy Sci 2006;89:3028-3037. doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(06)72576-0

44.
Borchardt S, Burnett TA, Heuwieser W, et al: Efficacy of an automated technology at detecting early postpartum estrus events: can we detect resumption of cyclicity? JDS Commun 2024;5:225-229. doi: 10.3168/jdsc.2023-0463

45.
Bretzinger LF, Tippenhauer CM, Plenio JL, et al: Effect of transition cow health and estrous expression detected by an automated activity monitoring system within 60 days in milk on reproductive performance of lactating Holstein cows. J Dairy Sci 2023;106:4429-4442. doi: 10.3168/jds.2022-22616

46.
LeRoy CNS, Walton JS, LeBlanc SJ: Estrous detection intensity and accuracy and optimal timing of insemination with automated activity monitors for dairy cows. J Dairy Sci 2018;101:1638-1647. doi: 10.3168/jds.2017-13505

47.
Borchardt S, Tippenhauer CM, Plenio JL, et al: Association of estrous expression detected by an automated activity monitoring system within 40 days in milk and reproductive performance of lactating Holstein cows. J Dairy Sci 2021;104:9195-9204. doi: 10.3168/jds.2020-19705

48.
Gümen A, Guenther JN, Wiltbank MC: Follicular size and response to Ovsynch versus detection of estrus in anovular and ovular lactating dairy cows. J Dairy Sci 2003;86:3184-3194. doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(03)73921-6

49.
Rial C, Laplacette A, Giordano JO: Effect of a targeted reproductive management program designed to prioritize insemination at detected estrus and optimize time to insemination on the reproductive performance of lactating dairy cows. J Dairy Sci 2022;105:8411-8425. doi: 10.3168/jds.2022-22082

50.
Burke CR, Roche JR, Millar RP, et al: Onset of normal cycles in postpartum anovulatory dairy cattle treated with kisspeptin. Reprod Fertil 2022;3:1-8. doi: 10.1530/RAF-21-0046
Published
2025-02-14
How to Cite
Roberts J., & Scully C. (2025). Anovular conditions impacting fertility in dairy cattle and considerations for clinical management. Clinical Theriogenology, 17, 2-8. https://doi.org/10.58292/CT.v17.11644