Reviewer Guidelines

Reviewers of Clinical Theriogenology are asked to consider the following points during their evaluation:

• Does the paper have clear aims and objectives / research questions that can be achieved within the scope of a Clinical Theriogenology journal paper?
• Does the paper make a contribution to knowledge?
• Is the work suitably grounded in the literature to justify its contribution and frame the analysis/evaluation?
• Does the analysis/ evaluation have a clear flow and logical argument?
• Is it presented in a way which is suitable for Clinical Theriogenology’s international audience?

Please note that peer reviewers should not upload submissions into large language models (LLMs) and other artificial intelligence tools (e.g. ChatGPT). Learn more about the journal’s policy on the use of AI tools.