Embryo selection in equine in vitro embryo production: current practices, limitations and future directions

  • Paulina Supera-Gallo Sydney School of Veterinary Science, The University of Sydney, Camden, NSW, Australia
  • Rory Nevard Sydney School of Veterinary Science, The University of Sydney, Camden, NSW, Australia
  • Agustin Ruiz Sydney School of Veterinary Science, The University of Sydney, Camden, NSW, Australia
Keywords: Horses, embryo, blastocyst, morphokinetics, cleavage, morphology

Abstract

Equine in vitro embryo production has become widely commercialized due to refinements in ovum pick up, oocyte maturation and the reliability of intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI). Although ICSI remains the primary fertilization method in horses, recent advances in sperm capacitation have enabled reliable in vitro fertilization with outcomes approaching those of ICSI, positioning in vitro fertilization as a complementary technology in equine embryo production. These techniques allow embryo production from subfertile mares or stallions with limited semen availability; however, accurate identification of embryos with predictable outcomes remains a limitation. In vitro-produced embryos exhibit higher rates of early pregnancy loss and monozygotic twins than in vivo-derived embryos, yet selection in many programs relies on traditional morphological assessment adapted from other species. Such assessments are weak predictors of foaling rates and lack standardization across laboratories, unlike systems established in cattle. In vitro-produced embryos display structural and nuclear deviations, including reduced cell numbers, poorly compacted inner cell mass, failure to form a glycoprotein capsule, and increased micronucleus formation. Consequently, clinical programs prioritize developmental rate during culture as a more reliable prognostic marker than morphology alone. Time lapse imaging further identifies abnormal first cleavage patterns as markers of poor outcome, supporting serial, dynamic assessment over subjective point-in-time evaluation. Current evidence supports a stepwise approach, prioritizing developmental timing, followed by equine-specific morphology and morphokinetic risk markers. Emerging technologies such as metabolic profiling, artificial intelligence and noninvasive preimplantation genetic testing require further validation against foaling outcomes before routine clinical adoption.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Rory Nevard, Sydney School of Veterinary Science, The University of Sydney, Camden, NSW, Australia

Senior Lecturer in Large Animal Theriogenology at The University of Sydney

References


1.
Claes A, Stout TAE: Success rate in a clinical equine in vitro embryo production program. Theriogenology 2022;187:215-218. doi: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2022.04.019

2.
Cuervo-Arango J, Claes AN, Beitsma M, et al: The effect of different flushing media used to aspirate follicles on the outcome of a commercial ovum pickup–ICSI program in mares. J Equine Vet Sci 2019;75:74-77. doi: 10.1016/J.JEVS.2019.01.015

3.
Fonte JS, Alonso MA, Junior MPM, et al: Successful equine in vitro embryo production by ICSI - effect of season, mares’ age, breed, and phase of the estrous cycle on embryo production. Theriogenology 2024;223:47-52. doi: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2024.04.007

4.
Velez IC, Arnold C, Jacobson CC, et al: Effects of repeated transvaginal aspiration of immature follicles on mare health and ovarian status. Equine Vet J 2012;44:78-83. doi: 10.1111/J.2042-3306.2012.00606.X

5.
Hannan MA, Watanabe H, Takeyama A, et al: In vitro embryo production via ovum pick-up (OPU) and intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) in pure and crossbred Japanese Hokkaido native ponies. J Reprod Dev 2025;71:191-194. doi: 10.1262/jrd.2025-011

6.
Galli C, Colleoni S, Duchi R, et al: Developmental competence of equine oocytes and embryos obtained by in vitro procedures ranging from in vitro maturation and ICSI to embryo culture, cryopreservation and somatic cell nuclear transfer. Anim Reprod Sci 2007;98:39-55. doi: 10.1016/j.anireprosci.2006.10.011

7.
Squires EL, Wilson JM, Kato H, et al: A pregnancy after intracytoplasmic sperm injection into equine oocytes matured in vitro. Theriogenology 1996;45:306. doi: 10.1016/0093-691X(96)84779-0

8.
McKinnon AO, Lacham-Kaplan O, Trounson AO: Pregnancies produced from fertile and infertile stallions by intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) of single frozen-thawed spermatozoa into in vivo matured mare oocytes. J Reprod Fertil Suppl 2000:513-517.

9.
Carnevale EM, Sessions DR: In vitro production of equine embryos. J Equine Vet Sci 2012;32:367-371. doi: 10.1016/J.JEVS.2012.05.054

10.
Cochran R, Meintjes M, Reggio B, et al: Production of live foals from sperm-injected oocytes harvested from pregnant mares. Journal of Reproduction and Fertility. Supplement. 2000;56:503-512.

11.
Palmer E, Bézard J, Magistrini M, et al: In vitro fertilization in the horse. A retrospective study. J Reprod Fertil Suppl 1991;44:375-384.

12.
Morris LHA: The development of in vitro embryo production in the horse. Equine Vet J 2018;50:712-720. doi: 10.1111/EVJ.12839

13.
Lazzari G, Colleoni S, Crotti G, et al: Laboratory production of equine embryos. J Equine Vet Sci 2020;89:103097. doi: 10.1016/J.JEVS.2020.103097

14.
Viana JHM. 2024 Statistics of embryo production and transfer in domestic farm animals. Embryo Technology Newsletter. 2025;43(4):1-15.

15.
Claes A, Galli C, Colleoni S, et al: Factors influencing oocyte recovery and in-vitro production of equine embryos in a commercial OPU/ICSI program. J Equine Vet Sci 2016;41:68-69. doi: 10.1016/j.jevs.2016.04.055

16.
Hinrichs K, Choi YH, Love CC, et al: Use of in vitro maturation of oocytes, intracytoplasmic sperm injection and in vitro culture to the blastocyst stage in a commercial equine assisted reproduction program. J Equine Vet Sci 2014;34:176. doi: 10.1016/j.jevs.2013.10.129

17.
Rader K, Choi YH, Hinrichs K: Intracytoplasmic sperm injection, embryo culture, and transfer of in vitro–produced blastocysts. Vet Clin N Am Equine Pract 2016;32:401-413. doi: 10.1016/J.CVEQ.2016.07.003

18.
Cuervo-Arango J, Claes AN, Stout TA: A retrospective comparison of the efficiency of different assisted reproductive techniques in the horse, emphasizing the impact of maternal age. Theriogenology 2019;132:36-44. doi: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2019.04.010

19.
Hinrichs K: In vitro production of equine embryos: state of the art. Reprod Domest Anim 2010;45:3-8. doi: 10.1111/J.1439-0531.2010.01624.X

20.
Lewis N, Canesin H, Choi YH, et al: Equine in vitro produced blastocysts: relationship of embryo morphology, stage and speed of development to foaling rate. Reprod Fertil Dev 2023;35:338-351. doi: 10.1071/rd22224

21.
Claes A, Cuervo-Arango J, van den Broek J, et al: Factors affecting the likelihood of pregnancy and embryonic loss after transfer of cryopreserved in vitro produced equine embryos. Equine Vet J 2019;51:446-450. doi: 10.1111/EVJ.13028

22.
Oliveira RAD, Alonso MA, Fonte JS, et al: Equine ICSI: an update on semen perspective. Anim Reprod 2024 Nov 22;21(4):e20240015. doi: 10.1590/1984-3143-ar2024-0015. PMID: 39629012; PMCID: PMC11614134.

23.
Choi YH, Velez IC, Macías-García B, et al: Effect of clinically-related factors on in vitro blastocyst development after equine ICSI. Theriogenology 2016;85:1289-1296. doi: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2015.12.015

24.
Galli C, Colleoni S, Duchi R, et al: Male factors affecting the success of equine in vitro embryo production by ovum pickup-intracytoplasmic sperm injection in a clinical setting. J Equine Vet Sci 2016;43:S6-S10. doi: 10.1016/j.jevs.2016.05.014

25.
Martin-Pelaez S, de la Fuente A, Takahashi K, et al: abnormal cleavage patterns in equine in vitro-produced embryos lead to higher early pregnancy loss. Equine Vet J 2025:1-11. doi: 10.1111/EVJ.70004

26.
Gardner DK, Lane M, Stevens J, et al: Blastocyst score affects implantation and pregnancy outcome: towards a single blastocyst transfer. Fertil Steril 2000;73:1155-1158. doi: 10.1016/S0015-0282(00)00518-5

27.
Montag M, Liebenthron J, Köster M: Which morphological scoring system is relevant in human embryo development? Placenta 2011;32 Suppl 3:S252-S256. doi: 10.1016/j.placenta.2011.07.009

28.
Angel-Velez D, De Coster T, Azari-Dolatabad N, et al: Embryo morphokinetics derived from fresh and vitrified bovine oocytes predict blastocyst development and nuclear abnormalities. Sci Rep 2023;13:4765. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-31268-6

29.
Munné S, Horcajadas JA, Seth-Smith ML, et al: Non-invasive selection for euploid embryos: prospects and pitfalls of the three most promising approaches. Reprod BioMed Online 2025;51:105077. doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2025.105077

30.
Bhide P, Chan DYL, Lanz D, et al: Clinical effectiveness and safety of time-lapse imaging systems for embryo incubation and selection in in-vitro fertilisation treatment (TILT): a multicentre, three-parallel-group, double-blind, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2024;404:256-265. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(24)00816-x

31.
Giménez C, Conversa L, Murria L, et al: Time-lapse imaging: morphokinetic analysis of in vitro fertilization outcomes. Fertil Steril 2023;120:218-227. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2023.06.015

32.
Pribenszky C, Nilselid A-M, Montag M: Time-lapse culture with morphokinetic embryo selection improves pregnancy and live birth chances and reduces early pregnancy loss: a meta-analysis. Reprod BioMed Online 2017;35:511-520. doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2017.06.022

33.
Kim J, Lee J, Jun JH: Non-invasive evaluation of embryo quality for the selection of transferable embryos in human in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer. Clin Exp Reprod Med 2022;49:225-238. doi: 10.5653/cerm.2022.05575

34.
Suzuki R, Okada M, Nagai H, et al: Morphokinetic analysis of pronuclei using time-lapse cinematography in bovine zygotes. Theriogenology 2021;166:55-63. doi: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2021.02.021

35.
Magata F: Time-lapse monitoring technologies for the selection of bovine in vitro fertilized embryos with high implantation potential. J Reprod Dev 2023;69:57-64. doi: 10.1262/jrd.2022-131

36.
Sugimura S, Yao T, Matoba S, et al: Morphokinetic prediction of embryo viability in cattle. Reprod Fertil Dev 2024;37(1):RD24139. doi: 10.1071/RD24139

37.
Martikainen H, Tiitinen A, Tomás C, et al: One versus two embryo transfer after IVF and ICSI: a randomized study. Hum Reprod 2001;16:1900-1903. doi: 10.1093/humrep/16.9.1900

38.
Gerris J, De Neubourg D, Mangelschots K, et al: Prevention of twin pregnancy after in-vitro fertilization or intracytoplasmic sperm injection based on strict embryo criteria: a prospective randomized clinical trial. Hum Reprod 1999;14:2581-2587. doi: 10.1093/humrep/14.10.2581

39.
Carnevale EM, Metcalf ES: Morphology, developmental stages and quality parameters of in vitro-produced equine embryos. Reprod Fertil Dev 2019;31:1758-1770. doi: 10.1071/rd19257

40.
Hinrichs K: The equine oocyte: factors affecting meiotic and developmental competence. Mol Reprod Dev 2010;77:651-661. doi: 10.1002/mrd.21186

41.
Walter J, Colleoni S, Lazzari G, et al: Maturational competence of equine oocytes is associated with alterations in their ‘cumulome’. Mol Hum Reprod 2024 Sep 12;30(9):gaae033. doi: 10.1093/molehr/gaae033

42.
Galli C, Duchi R, Crotti G, et al: Bovine embryo technologies. Theriogenology 2003;59:599-616. doi: 10.1016/s0093-691x(02)01243-8

43.
Steptoe PC, Edwards RG: Birth after the reimplantation of a human embryo. Lancet 1978;2:366. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(78)92957-4

44.
Dell’Aquila ME, Cho YS, Minoia P, et al: Intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) versus conventional IVF on abattoir-derived and in vitro-matured equine oocytes. Theriogenology 1997;47:1139-1156. doi: 10.1016/s0093-691x(97)00095-2

45.
Leemans B, Gadella BM, Stout TAE, et al: Why doesn’t conventional IVF work in the horse? The equine oviduct as a microenvironment for capacitation/fertilization. Reproduction 2016;152:R233-R245. doi: 10.1530/REP-16-0420

46.
Kimura Y, Yanagimachi R: Intracytoplasmic sperm injection in the mouse. Biol Reprod 1995;52:709-720. doi: 10.1095/biolreprod52.4.709

47.
Huang T, Kimura Y, Yanagimachi R: The use of piezo micromanipulation for intracytoplasmic sperm injection of human oocytes. J Assist Reprod Genet 1996;13:320-328. doi: 10.1007/bf02070146

48.
Salgado RM, Brom-De-Luna JG, Resende HL, et al: Lower blastocyst quality after conventional vs. Piezo ICSI in the horse reflects delayed sperm component remodeling and oocyte activation. J Assist Reprod Genet 2018;35:825-840. doi: 10.1007/s10815-018-1174-9

49.
Lim CK, Shin SH, Kim G-W, et al: Comparison of the clinical outcomes between conventional intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) and PIEZO-ICSI in women undergoing the first cycle of in-vitro fertilization. PLoS One 2025;20:e0330951. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0330951

50.
Furuhashi K, Saeki Y, Enatsu N, et al: Piezo-assisted ICSI improves fertilization and blastocyst development rates compared with conventional ICSI in women aged more than 35 years. Reprod Med Biol 2019;18:357-361. doi: 10.1002/rmb2.12290

51.
Choi YH, Love CC, Love LB, et al: Developmental competence in vivo and in vitro of in vitro-matured equine oocytes fertilized by intracytoplasmic sperm injection with fresh or frozen-thawed spermatozoa. Reproduction 2002;123:455-465. doi: 10.1530/rep.0.1230455

52.
Galli C, Crotti G, Turini P, et al: Frozen-thawed embryos produced by Ovum Pick Up of immature oocytes and ICSI are capable to establish pregnancies in the horse. Theriogenology 2002;58:705-708. doi: 10.1016/S0093-691X(02)00771-9

53.
Squires E: Current reproductive technologies impacting equine embryo production. J Equine Vet Sci 2020;89:102981. doi: 10.1016/j.jevs.2020.102981

54.
Malin K, De la Fuente A, De Castro T, et al: Intracytoplasmic sperm injection zone: insights and applications from a university-based assisted reproduction laboratory. Clinical Theriogenology 2024;16:10670. doi: 10.58292/CT.V16.10670

55.
Jacobson CC, Choi YH, Hayden SS, et al: Recovery of mare oocytes on a fixed biweekly schedule, and resulting blastocyst formation after intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Theriogenology 2010; 73:1116-1126. doi: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2010.01.013

56.
Galli C, Duchi R, Colleoni S, et al: Ovum pick up, intracytoplasmic sperm injection and somatic cell nuclear transfer in cattle, buffalo and horses: from the research laboratory to clinical practice. Theriogenology 2014;81:138-151. doi: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2013.09.008

57.
Hawley LR, Enders AC, Hinrichs K: Comparison of equine and bovine oocyte-cumulus morphology within the ovarian follicle. Biol Reprod 1995;52:243-252. doi: 10.1093/biolreprod/52.monograph_series1.243

58.
Cuervo-Arango J, Sala-Ayala L, Márquez-Moya A, et al: The influence of aspiration pressure, follicle flushing method and needle rotation during single-operator OPU technique on oocyte recovery and embryo production in the mare. Animals 2025;15:832. doi: 10.3390/ani15060832

59.
Márquez-Moya A, Sala-Ayala L, Carreras-Vico N, et al: Factors influencing oocyte recovery during ultrasound-guided follicle aspiration in mares: a postmortem study. Theriogenology 2025;235:39-45. doi: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2024.12.032

60.
Cuervo-Arango J, Claes AN, Stout TAE: Mare and stallion effects on blastocyst production in a commercial equine ovum pick-up-intracytoplasmic sperm injection program. Reprod Fertil Dev 2019;31:1894-1903. doi: 10.1071/RD19201

61.
Cuervo-Arango J, Necchi D, Clutton-Brock A, et al: Transvaginal follicle aspiration in mares: a description of different techniques and comparison of results ccross different OPU clinics. Reprod Domest Anim 2025;60(3):e70043. doi: 10.1111/rda.70043

62.
Stout TAE: Clinical application of in vitro embryo production in the horse. J Equine Vet Sci 2020;89:103011. doi: 10.1016/j.jevs.2020.103011

63.
Watson AJ: Oocyte cytoplasmic maturation: a key mediator of oocyte and embryo developmental competence. J Anim Sci 2007;85:E1-E3. doi: 10.2527/jas.2006-432

64.
Conti M, Franciosi F: Acquisition of oocyte competence to develop as an embryo: integrated nuclear and cytoplasmic events. Hum Reprod Update 2018;24:245-266. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dmx040

65.
Rizzo M, Ducheyne KD, Deelen C, et al: Advanced mare age impairs the ability of in vitro-matured oocytes to correctly align chromosomes on the metaphase plate. Equine Vet J 2019;51:252-257. doi: 10.1111/evj.12995

66.
Goudet G, Bézard J, Duchamp G, et al: Equine oocyte competence for nuclear and cytoplasmic in vitro maturation: effect of follicle size and hormonal environment. Biol Reprod 1997;57:232-245. doi: 10.1095/biolreprod57.2.232

67.
Felix MR, Turner RM, Dobbie T, et al: Successful in vitro fertilization in the horse: production of blastocysts and birth of foals after prolonged sperm incubation for capacitation. Biol Reprod 2022;107:1551-1564. doi: 10.1093/biolre/ioac172

68.
Martin-Pelaez S, Fuente A, Takahashi K, et al: IVF with frozen-thawed sperm after prolonged capacitation yields comparable results to ICSI in horses: a morphokinetics study. Theriogenology 2025;232:39-45. doi: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2024.10.032

69.
Felix MR, Dobbie T, Woodward E, et al: Equine in vitro fertilization with frozen–thawed semen is associated with shortened pre-incubation time and modified capacitation-related changes. Biol Reprod 2025;112:867-879. doi: 10.1093/biolre/ioaf043

70.
Ramírez-Agámez L, Crowley JB, Love CC, et al: Blastocyst production by conventional in vitro fertilization (cIVF) in horses: Effects of sperm storage method, incubation timing of cool-stored semen before gamete co-incubation, and comparisons between cIVF and intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI). Theriogenology 2025;248:117611. doi: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2025.117611

71.
Orsolini MF, Meyers SA, Dini P: An update on semen physiology, technologies, and selection techniques for the advancement of in vitro equine embryo production: section II. Animals 2021;11:3319. doi: 10.3390/ani11113319

72.
Foss R, Ortis H, Hinrichs K: Effect of potential oocyte transport protocols on blastocyst rates after intracytoplasmic sperm injection in the horse. Equine Vet J 2013;45:39-43. doi: 10.1111/EVJ.12159

73.
Choi YH, Love LB, Varner DD, et al: Holding immature equine oocytes in the absence of meiotic inhibitors: effect on germinal vesicle chromatin and blastocyst development after intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Theriogenology 2006;66:955-963. doi: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2006.01.064

74.
Diaw M, Salgado RM, Canesin HS, et al: Effect of different shipping temperatures (~22 °C vs. ~7 °C) and holding media on blastocyst development after overnight holding of immature equine cumulus-oocyte complexes. Theriogenology 2018;111:62-68. doi: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2017.12.044

75.
Galli C, Colleoni S, Claes A, et al: Overnight shipping of equine oocytes from remote locations to an ART laboratory enables access to the flexibility of Ovum Pick Up-ICSI and embryo cryopreservation technologies. J Equine Vet Sci 2016;41:82-82. doi: 10.1016/j.jevs.2016.04.084

76.
Merlo B, Del Prete C, Mari G, et al: Overnight holding aids in selection of developmentally competent equine oocytes. Anim Reprod Sci 2022;245:107071. doi: 10.1016/j.anireprosci.2022.107071

77.
Umair M, Scheeren V, Beitsma MM, et al: In vitro-produced equine blastocysts exhibit greater dispersal and intermingling of inner cell mass cells than in vivo embryos. Int J Mol Sci 2023;24(11):9619. doi: 10.3390/ijms24119619

78.
Lewis N, Schnauffer K, Hinrichs K, et al: Morphokinetics of early equine embryo development in vitro using time-lapse imaging, and use in selecting blastocysts for transfer. Reprod Fertil De 2019;31:1851-1861. doi: 10.1071/rd19225

79.
Benammar A, Derisoud E, Vialard F, et al: The mare: a pertinent model for human assisted reproductive technologies? Animals 2021;11. doi: 10.3390/ANI11082304

80.
Brooks KE, Daughtry BL, Metcalf E, et al: Assessing equine embryo developmental competency by time-lapse image analysis. Reprod Fertil Dev 2019;31:1840-1850. doi: 10.1071/rd19254

81.
Krisher RL: The effect of oocyte quality on development. J Anim Sci 2004;82(E-Suppl):E14-E23. doi: 10.2527/2004.8213_supplE14x

82.
Tremoleda JL, Van Haeften T, Stout TAE, et al: Cytoskeleton and chromatin reorganization in horse oocytes following intracytoplasmic sperm injection: patterns associated with normal and defective fertilization. Biol Reprod 2003;69:186-194. doi: 10.1095/biolreprod.102.012823

83.
Ducheyne KD, Rizzo M, Cuervo-Arango J, et al: In vitro production of horse embryos predisposes to micronucleus formation, whereas time to blastocyst formation affects likelihood of pregnancy. Reprod Fertil Dev 2019;31:1830-1839. doi: 10.1071/RD19227

84.
Bó GA, Mapletoft RJ: Evaluation and classification of bovine embryos. Anim Reprod 2013;10:344-348.

85.
Wells C, Hayden C, Rea M, et al: Advancing bovine embryo evaluation: machine learning to assess embryos in routine embryo transfer practice. J IVF Worldwide 2025;3:45-57. doi: 10.46989/001C.141131

86.
Sugimura S, Akai T, Hashiyada Y, et al: Promising system for selecting healthy in vitro-fertilized embryos in cattle. PLoS One 2012;7. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0036627

87.
Dahdouh EM, Balayla J, García-Velasco JA: Comprehensive chromosome screening improves embryo selection: a meta-analysis. Fertil Steril 2015;104(6):1503-1512. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2015.08.038

88.
McLernon DJ, Harrild K, Bergh C, et al: Clinical effectiveness of elective single versus double embryo transfer: meta-analysis of individual patient data from randomised trials. BMJ 2010;341:c6945. doi: 10.1136/bmj.c6945

89.
Pandian Z, Marjoribanks J, Ozturk O, et al: Number of embryos for transfer following in vitro fertilisation or intra-cytoplasmic sperm injection. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2013; 2013:Cd003416. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003416.pub4

90.
Rozen G, Stern K: An update on fertility assistance and assisted reproductive technologies. Aust J Gen Pract 2023;52:11-17. doi: 10.31128/AJGP-08-22-6512

91.
Betteridge KJ: The structure and function of the equine capsule in relation to embryo manipulation and transfer. Equine Vet J 1989;21:92-100. doi: 10.1111/j.2042-3306.1989.tb04690.x

92.
Tremoleda JL, Stout TAE, Lagutina I, et al: Effects of in vitro production on horse embryo morphology, cytoskeletal characteristics, and blastocyst capsule formation. Biol Reprod 2003;69:1895-1906. doi: 10.1095/biolreprod.103.018515

93.
Choi YH, Harding HD, Hartman DL, et al: The uterine environment modulates trophectodermal POU5F1 levels in equine blastocysts. Reproduction 2009;138:589-599. doi: 10.1530/rep-08-0394

94.
Cuervo-Arango J, Claes AN, Stout TAE: In vitro-produced horse embryos exhibit a very narrow window of acceptable recipient mare uterine synchrony compared with in vivo-derived embryos. Reprod Fertil Dev 2019;31:1904-1911. doi: 10.1071/RD19294

95.
Stout TA, Meadows S, Allen WR: Stage-specific formation of the equine blastocyst capsule is instrumental to hatching and to embryonic survival in vivo. Anim Reprod Sci 2005;87:269-281. doi: 10.1016/j.anireprosci.2004.11.009

96.
Lewis N, Hinrichs K, Schnauffer K, et al: Effect of oocyte source and transport time on rates of equine oocyte maturation and cleavage after fertilization by ICSI, with a note on the validation of equine embryo morphological classification. Clinical Theriogenology 2016;8:25-39. doi: 10.58292/ct.v8.11197

97.
Schrode N, Saiz N, Di Talia S, et al: GATA6 Levels modulate primitive endoderm cell fate choice and timing in the mouse Blastocyst. Dev Cell 2014;29:454-467. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2014.04.011

98.
Foss R: Intracytoplasmic sperm injection-produced equine embryos: transport, thawing, and transfer. Clinical Theriogenology 2022;14:252-255. doi: 10.58292/ct.v14.9690

99.
Dijkstra A, Cuervo-Arango J, Stout TAE, et al: Monozygotic multiple pregnancies after transfer of single in vitro produced equine embryos. Equine Vet J 2020;52:258-261. doi: 10.1111/evj.13146

100.
Seidel Jr, GE: Cryopreservation of equine embryos. Vet Clin N Am Equine Pract 1996;12:85-99. doi: 10.1016/S0749-0739(17)30296-1

101.
Slade NP, Takeda T, Squires EL, et al: A new procedure for the cryopreservation of equine embryos. Theriogenology 1985;24:45-58. doi: 10.1016/0093-691x(85)90211-0

102.
Hendriks WK, Roelen BAJ, Colenbrander B, et al: Cellular damage suffered by equine embryos after exposure to cryoprotectants or cryopreservation by slow-freezing or vitrification. Equine Vet J 2015;47:701-707. doi: 10.1111/evj.12341

103.
Choi YH, Velez IC, Riera FL, et al: Successful cryopreservation of expanded equine blastocysts. Theriogenology 2011;76:143-152. doi: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2011.01.028

104.
Hinrichs K, Choi Y-H: Equine embryo biopsy, genetic testing, and cryopreservation. J Equine Vet Sci 2012;32:390-396. doi: 10.1016/j.jevs.2012.05.005

105.
Hinrichs K: Advances in holding and cryopreservation of equine oocytes and embryos. J Equine Vet Sci 2020;89:102990. doi: 10.1016/j.jevs.2020.102990

106.
Eldridge-Panuska WD, di Brienza VC, Seidel GE, Jr, et al: Establishment of pregnancies after serial dilution or direct transfer by vitrified equine embryos. Theriogenology 2005;63:1308-1319. doi: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2004.06.015

107.
Squires EL, McCue PM: Cryopreservation of equine embryos. J Equine Vet Sci 2016;41:7-12. doi: 10.1016/j.jevs.2016.03.009

108.
Umair M, Beitsma M, de Ruijter-Villani M, et al: Vitrifying expanded equine embryos collapsed by blastocoel aspiration is less damaging than slow-freezing. Theriogenology 2023;202:28-35. doi: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2023.02.028

109.
Shu Y, Watt J, Gebhardt J, et al: The value of fast blastocoele re-expansion in the selection of a viable thawed blastocyst for transfer. Fertil Steril 2009;91:401-406. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2007.11.083

110.
Zhao J, Yan Y, Huang X, et al: Blastocoele expansion: an important parameter for predicting clinical success pregnancy after frozen-warmed blastocysts transfer. Reprod Biol Endocrinol 2019;17:15. doi: 10.1186/s12958-019-0454-2

111.
McCue P, DeLuca C, Ferris R, et al: How to evaluate equine embryos. Proc Annual Convention of the AAEP - Las Vegas, NV, USA, 2009 2009;55:252-256.

112.
Morris LHA, Maclellan LJ: A simplified grading system for in vivo and in vitro derived vitrified equine embryos. J Equine Vet Sci 2024;132:104983. doi: 10.1016/j.jevs.2023.104983

113.
Montag M, Toth B, Strowitzki T: New approaches to embryo selection. Reprod BioMed Online 2013;27:539-546. doi: 10.1016/J.RBMO.2013.05.013

114.
Day ML, Johnson MH, Cook DI: A cytoplasmic cell cycle controls the activity of a K+ channel in pre-implantation mouse embryos. EMBO J 1998;17:1952-1960. doi: 10.1093/emboj/17.7.1952

115.
Gardner DK, Balaban B: Assessment of human embryo development using morphological criteria in an era of time-lapse, algorithms and ‘OMICS’: is looking good still important? Mol Hum Reprod 2016;22:704-718. doi: 10.1093/molehr/gaw057

116.
Claes A, Cuervo-Arango J, Colleoni S, et al: Speed of in vitro embryo development affects the likelihood of foaling and the foal sex ratio. Reprod Fertil Dev 2020;32:468-473. doi: 10.1071/RD19298

117.
Gutiérrez-Adán A, Granados J, Pintado B, et al: Influence of glucose on the sex ratio of bovine IVM/IVF embryos cultured in vitro. Reprod Fertil Dev 2001;13:361-365. doi: 10.1071/rd00039

118.
Kovacs P: Embryo selection: the role of time-lapse monitoring. Reprod Biol Endocrinol 2014;12:1-11. doi: 10.1186/1477-7827-12-124

119.
Martino NA, Marzano G, Mastrorocco A, et al: Use of time-lapse imaging to evaluate morphokinetics of in vitro equine blastocyst development after oocyte holding for two days at 15°C versus room temperature before intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Reprod Fertil Dev 2019;31:1862-1873. doi: 10.1071/RD19223

120.
Meyers S, Burruel V, Kato M, et al: Equine non-invasive time-lapse imaging and blastocyst development. Reprod Fertil Dev 2019;31:1874-1884. doi: 10.1071/RD19260

121.
Magata F, Ideta A, Okubo H, et al: Growth potential of bovine embryos presenting abnormal cleavage observed through time lapse cinematography. Theriogenology 2019;133:119-124. doi: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2019.04.031

122.
Sugimura S, Akai T, Imai K: Selection of viable in vitro-fertilized bovine embryos using time-lapse monitoring in microwell culture dishes. J Reprod Dev 2017;63:353. doi: 10.1262/JRD.2017-041

123.
Kovacic B, Vlaisavljevic V, Reljic M, et al: Developmental capacity of different morphological types of day 5 human morulae and blastocysts. Reprod BioMed Online 2004;8:687-694. doi: 10.1016/S1472-6483(10)61650-1

124.
Gutiérrez-Adán A, Rizos D, Fair T, et al: Effect of speed of development on mRNA expression pattern in early bovine embryos cultured in vivo or in vitro. Mol Reprod Devt 2004;68:441-448. doi: 10.1002/mrd.20113

125.
Masuda Y, Hasebe R, Kuromi Y, et al: Three-dimensional live imaging of bovine preimplantation embryos: a new method for IVF embryo evaluation. Front Vet Sci 2021;8:639249. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2021.639249

126.
Gonzales DS, Jones JM, Pinyopummintr T, et al: Implantation: trophectoderm projections: a potential means for locomotion, attachment and implantation of bovine, equine and human blastocysts. Hum Reprod 1996;11:2739-2745. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a019201

127.
de la Fuente A, Omyla K, Cooper C, et al: Embryo pulsing: repeated expansion and contraction of in vivo and in vitro equine blastocysts. J Equine Vet Sci 2023;128:104891. doi: 10.1016/j.jevs.2023.104891

128.
Rubio I, Kuhlmann R, Agerholm I, et al: Limited implantation success of direct-cleaved human zygotes: a time-lapse study. Fertil Steril 2012;98:1458-1463. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2012.07.1135

129.
Kligman I, Benadiva C, Alikani M, et al: The presence of multinucleated blastomeres in human embryos is correlated with chromosomal abnormalities. Hum Reprod (Oxford, England) 1996;11(7):1492-1498. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a019424

130.
Ambruosi B, Lacalandra GM, Iorga AI, et al: Cytoplasmic lipid droplets and mitochondrial distribution in equine oocytes: implications on oocyte maturation, fertilization and developmental competence after ICSI. Theriogenology 2009;71:1093-1104. doi: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2008.12.002

131.
Hardy K: Apoptosis in the human embryo. Rev Reprod 1999;4:125-134. doi: 10.1530/ror.0.0040125

132.
De Coster T, Zhao Y, Tšuiko O, et al: Genome-wide equine preimplantation genetic testing enabled by simultaneous haplotyping and copy number detection. Sci Rep 2024;14:2003. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-48103-7

133.
Barandalla M, Colleoni S, Perota A, et al: Preimplantation genetic testing in horses: biopsy of Piezo-ICSI embryos for sex, coat color, and disease alleles. Theriogenology 2025;246:117525. doi: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2025.117525

134.
Amin N, Kteily K, Deniz S, et al: The ART of embryo selection: a review of methods to rank the most competent embryo(s) for transfer to optimize IVF success. Biomedicines 2025;13(11):2766. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines13112766

135.
Navarro-Sánchez L, García-Pascual C, Rubio C, et al: Non-invasive preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidies: an update. Reprod Biomed Online 2022;44:817-828. doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2022.01.012

136.
Shamonki MI, Jin H, Haimowitz Z, et al: Proof of concept: preimplantation genetic screening without embryo biopsy through analysis of cell-free DNA in spent embryo culture media. Fertil Steril 2016;106:1312-1318. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2016.07.1112

137.
Rubio C, Navarro-Sánchez L, García-Pascual CM, et al: Multicenter prospective study of concordance between embryonic cell-free DNA and trophectoderm biopsies from 1301 human blastocysts. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2020;223:751.e1-751.e13. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2020.04.035

138.
Ramírez-Agámez L, Castaneda C, Hernández-Avilés C, et al: A study on methods for preimplantation genetic testing (PGT) on in vivo- and in vitro-produced equine embryos, with emphasis on embryonic sex determination. Theriogenology 2024;227:41-48. doi: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2024.07.009

139.
Turner KJ, Silvestri G, Black DH, et al: Karyomapping for simultaneous genomic evaluation and aneuploidy screening of preimplantation bovine embryos: the first live-born calves. Theriogenology 2019;125:249-258. doi: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2018.11.014

140.
Silvestri G, Canedo-Ribeiro C, Serrano-Albal M, et al: Preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy improves live birth rates with in vitro produced bovine embryos: a blind retrospective study. Cells 2021;10(9):2284. doi: 10.3390/cells10092284

141.
Fujii T, Naito A, Moriyasu S, et al: Potential of preimplantation genomic selection using the blastomere separation technique in bovine in vitro fertilized embryos. J Reprod Dev 2021;67:155-159. doi: 10.1262/jrd.2020-153

142.
Oliveira CS, Camargo LSA, da Silva M, et al: Embryo biopsies for genomic selection in tropical dairy cattle. Anim Reprod 2023;20:e20230064. doi: 10.1590/1984-3143-ar2023-0064

143.
Squires EL: Perspectives on the development and incorporation of assisted reproduction in the equine industry. Reprod Fertil Dev 2019;31:1753-1757. doi: 10.1071/rd19365

144.
Rabaglino MB, Salilew-Wondim D, Zolini A, et al: Machine-learning methods applied to integrated transcriptomic data from bovine blastocysts and elongating conceptuses to identify genes predictive of embryonic competence. FASEB J 2023;37:e22809. doi: 10.1096/fj.202201977R

145.
Wong CC, Loewke KE, Bossert NL, et al: Non-invasive imaging of human embryos before embryonic genome activation predicts development to the blastocyst stage. Nat Biotechnol 2010;28:1115-1121. doi: 10.1038/nbt.1686

146.
Reich A, Klatsky P, Carson S, et al: The transcriptome of a human polar body accurately reflects its sibling oocyte. J Biol Chem 2011;286:40743-40749. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M111.289868

147.
van Montfoort AP, Geraedts JP, Dumoulin JC, et al: Differential gene expression in cumulus cells as a prognostic indicator of embryo viability: a microarray analysis. Mol Hum Reprod 2008;14:157-168. doi: 10.1093/molehr/gam088

148.
Gardner DK, Meseguer M, Rubio C, et al: Diagnosis of human preimplantation embryo viability. Hum Reprod Update 2015;21:727-747. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dmu064

149.
McReynolds S, Vanderlinden L, Stevens J, et al: Lipocalin-1: a potential marker for noninvasive aneuploidy screening. Fertil Steril 2011;95:2631-2633. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2011.01.141

150.
Banliat C, Mahé C, Lavigne R, et al: The proteomic analysis of bovine embryos developed in vivo or in vitro reveals the contribution of the maternal environment to early embryo. BMC Genomics 2022;23:839. doi: 10.1186/s12864-022-09076-5

151.
Botros L, Sakkas D, Seli E: Metabolomics and its application for non-invasive embryo assessment in IVF. Mol Hum Reprod 2008;14:679-690. doi: 10.1093/molehr/gan066

152.
Lane M, O’Donovan MK, Squires EL, et al: Assessment of metabolism of equine morulae and blastocysts. Mol Reprod Dev 2001;59:33-37. doi: 10.1002/mrd.1004

153.
Brück I, Hyland JH: Measurements of glucose metabolism in single equine embryos during early development. J Reprod Fertil Suppl 1991;44:419-425.

154.
Hardarson T, Ahlström A, Rogberg L, et al: Non-invasive metabolomic profiling of Day 2 and 5 embryo culture medium: a prospective randomized trial. Hum Reprod 2012;27:89-96. doi: 10.1093/humrep/der373

155.
Biggers JD, Whittingham DG, Donahue RP: The pattern of energy metabolism in the mouse oöcyte and zygote. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1967;58:560-567. doi: 10.1073/pnas.58.2.560

156.
Conaghan J, Hardy K, Handyside AH, et al: Selection criteria for human embryo transfer: a comparison of pyruvate uptake and morphology. J Assist Reprod Genet 2005;10:21-30. doi: 10.1007/BF01204436

157.
Conaghan J, Handyside AH, Winston RM, et al: Effects of pyruvate and glucose on the development of human preimplantation embryos in vitro. J Reprod Fertil 1993;99:87-95. doi: 10.1530/jrf.0.0990087

158.
Leese HJ, Barton AM: Pyruvate and glucose uptake by mouse ova and preimplantation embryos. J Reprod Fertil 1984;72:9-13. doi: 10.1530/jrf.0.0720009

159.
Brison DR, Leese HJ: Energy metabolism in late preimplantation rat embryos. J Reprod Fertil 1991;93:245-251. doi: 10.1530/jrf.0.0930245

160.
Gardner DK, Lane M: Culture of viable human blastocysts in defined sequential serum-free media. Hum Reprod 1998;13 Suppl 3:148-159; discussion 160. doi: 10.1093/humrep/13.suppl_3.148

161.
Sutton-McDowall ML, Gilchrist RB, et al: The pivotal role of glucose metabolism in determining oocyte developmental competence. Reproduction 2010;139:685-695. doi: 10.1530/rep-09-0345

162.
Gardner DK, Lane M, Stevens J, et al: Noninvasive assessment of human embryo nutrient consumption as a measure of developmental potential. Fertil Steril 2001;76:1175-1180. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(01)02888-6

163.
Houghton FD, Hawkhead JA, Humpherson PG, et al: Non-invasive amino acid turnover predicts human embryo developmental capacity. Hum Reprod 2002;17:999-1005. doi: 10.1093/humrep/17.4.999

164.
Picton HM, Elder K, Houghton FD, et al: Association between amino acid turnover and chromosome aneuploidy during human preimplantation embryo development in vitro. Mol Hum Reprod 2010;16:557-569. doi: 10.1093/molehr/gaq040

165.
Krisher RL, Prather RS: A role for the Warburg effect in preimplantation embryo development: metabolic modification to support rapid cell proliferation. Mol Reprod Dev 2012;79:311-320. doi: 10.1002/mrd.22037

166.
Seli E, Vergouw CG, Morita H, et al: Noninvasive metabolomic profiling as an adjunct to morphology for noninvasive embryo assessment in women undergoing single embryo transfer. Fertil Steril 2010;94:535-542. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2009.03.078

167.
Drozdowicz-Tomsia K, Anwer AG, Cahill MA, et al: Multiphoton fluorescence lifetime imaging microscopy reveals free-to-bound NADH ratio changes associated with metabolic inhibition. J Biomed Opt 2014;19:086016. doi: 10.1117/1.jbo.19.8.086016

168.
Uzzaman MA, Rahman MA, Ohta A: Bovine embryo development monitoring using differential electrical impedance spectroscopy. Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc 2024;2024:1-4. doi: 10.1109/EMBC53108.2024.10782213

169.
Tsopp E, Kilk K, Gambini A, et al: Metabolomics reveals early predictors of blastocyst formation in equine ICSI-derived embryos. Theriogenology 2026;257:117879. doi: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2026.117879

170.
Huang B, Si K, Guo Y, et al: Timelapse-based 3D reconstruction of blastocysts reveals 3D morphologies of human blastocysts. NPJ Digit Med 2025;8:671. doi: 10.1038/s41746-025-02028-9

171.
Liu X, Yu M, Liu H, et al: DLT-Embryo: a dual-branch local feature fusion enhanced transformer for embryo multi-stage classification. Biomed Signal Process Control 2025;102:107266. doi: 10.1016/j.bspc.2024.107266

172.
Shi J, Tong W, Yu Z, et al: Quantification of elastic modulus variations during zebrafish embryo development using a 3D-printed microfluidic platform. Sens Actuators B Chem 2025;423:136691. doi: 10.1016/j.snb.2024.136691
Published
2026-07-06
How to Cite
Supera-Gallo , P., Nevard , R., & Ruiz , A. (2026). Embryo selection in equine in vitro embryo production: current practices, limitations and future directions. Clinical Theriogenology, 18. https://doi.org/10.58292/CT.v18.14042