Accuracy of radiographic fetal count in ewes

Camille  Ogdon; Charles  Estill; Kelly  Van Scoyk; Lauren  Newsom

doi:10.58292/ct.v15.9221

Camille Ogdon Carlson College of Veterinary Medicine, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR, USA
Charles Estill Carlson College of Veterinary Medicine, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR, USA
Kelly Van Scoyk Carlson College of Veterinary Medicine, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR, USA
Lauren Newsom Carlson College of Veterinary Medicine, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR, USA

DOI: https://doi.org/10.58292/ct.v15.9221

Keywords: Sheep, pregnancy, radiograph, ultrasound, abdominal computed tomography, fetal count, litter size, pregnant ewe, fetal skeleton

Abstract

Accurate fetal count is important for farm animal species as the number of fetuses can affect management decisions in both research and production settings. Documented methods of pregnancy diagnosis include radiography, progesterone assays, transrectal palpation, and transrectal and transabdominal ultrasonography; however, there is variability in fetal count accuracy with each of these methods. Abdominal radiography evaluation in 13 pregnant ewes among observers of various skill levels was compared retrospectively with the known number of fetuses determined using computed tomography. Overall accuracy using abdominal radiography across skill levels for determining fetal counts correctly was 79%. Accuracy decreased as the number of fetuses increased, with accuracies for singleton, twin, and triplet pregnancies being 92, 72, and 50%, respectively. Additionally, observer experience was inversely related to radiographic fetal count accuracy.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1 Thrall DE: The uterus, ovaries, and testes. In: Textbook of veterinary diagnostic radiology. 6th ed. St Louis, MO: Elsevier; 2013, pp. 758–761.

2 Karen A, Kovács P, Beckers JF, et al: Pregnancy diagnosis in sheep: review of the most practical methods. Acta Vet Brno 2001;70:115–126. doi: 10.2754/avb200170020115

3 Wenham G: A radiographic study of early skeletal development in foetal sheep. J Agric Sci (Tor) 1981;96:39–44. doi: 10.1017/S0021859600031853

4 Barker CAV, Cawley AJ: Radiographic detection of fetal numbers in goats. Can Vet J 1967;8:59–61.

5 Chauhan FS, Waziri MA: Evaluation of rectal-abdominal palpation technique and hormonal diagnosis of pregnancy in small ruminants. Indian J Anim Reprod 1991;12:63–67.

6 Ishwar AK: Pregnancy diagnosis in sheep and goats: a review. Small Rumin Res 1995;17:37–44. doi: 10.1016/0921-4488(95)00644-z.

7 Jones AK, Gately RE, McFadden KK, et al: Transabdominal ultrasound for detection of pregnancy, fetal and placental landmarks, and fetal age before day 45 of gestation in the sheep. Theriogenology 2016;85:939–945. doi: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2015.11.002

8 Fukui Y, Kobayashi M, Tsubaki M, et al: Comparison of two ultrasonic methods for multiple pregnancy diagnosis in sheep and indicators of multiple pregnant ewes in the blood. Anim Reprod Sci 1986;11:25–33. doi: 10.1016/0378-4320(86)90099-0

9 Lone SA, Gupta SK, Kumar N, et al: Recent technologies for pregnancy diagnosis in sheep and goat: an overview. Int J Sci Environ Technol 2016;5:1208–1216.

10 Rajtova V, Horak J: The effect of acute irradiation on the development of limbs in sheep. Biologia (Bratislava) 1976;31:171–178.

11 Kase KR, Strom DJ, Thomadsen BR, et al: Ionizing radiation exposure of the population of the United States. Report No. 160. NCRP; 2009. [cited 2022 December 1]. Available from: www.epa.gov.

12 Copel J, El-Sayed Y, Heine RP et al: The American college of obstetricians and gynecologists committee opinion: guidelines for diagnostic imaging during pregnancy and lactation. Obstet Gynecol 2017;130:e210–e216. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000002355